Feature Requests
If you’ve got a feature request, you’ve come to the right place! Please relay your request request here, along with any additional details you think might be helpful.
This is not the spot for feedback on current features, only new plausible ideas will be considered. Please be courteous of others and upvote if you believe strongly enough in an idea!
242 results found
-
update template portion in documentation
It needs to use 't:version': to reference the version. I found this on another website but it would be helpful to have this added to the main docs page
2 votes -
Reusable Template Blocks
Some customers may want the option to save blocks in templates, so that these blocks can be reused in multiple templates.
2 votes -
S/MIME signing support
I'd love to sign (not encrypt) outgoing mails in Mailgun using a S/MIME cert. Please add support to do so.
2 votes -
Webhook URL on Message level, not domain
Webhook on Message level, not on domain level.
We are using DTAP environments, with different endpoints for webhook listners. We dont want that all the Production Webhooks will also be send to the Acceptance environment.
Could we add a Webhook URL to the Message API?
2 votes -
Mailing List Members, sorting possibilities
Sorting the list of mailing list members by email and/or by name
2 votes -
ability to assign IP alongside assigned IP pool
Hello.
Here is a use-case. example.com is assigned with some IP pool. I need to add additional IP to this domain without adding it to the IP pool.
Currently, it's not possible. Please, make it possible.thanks.
2 votes -
Email template parameter
For email template parameter. Mailgun has 2 types of parameter one is {{paramname}} and the other is %recipient.paramname%. this design force email template to choose which parameter type should be provided when calling via api. My suggestion is use one {{param_name}} and then if the api client send both global parameter and recipient parameter. when apply you should apply by merge the later with the former.
2 votes -
Make dashbaord boxes clickable
Can you please give me a quick and easy way to see the mails you are saying failed or were supressed? One way would be to make these boxes clickable (see attached).
2 votes -
Copy template from one domain to another
Copy template(s) from one domain to another
2 votes -
Remove RequestedAuthnContext Parameter from SAML Response
In the MG SAML requests a parameter called RequestedAuthnContext is included. Some customers wish to remove this parameter, however doing so has the potential to lead to unwanted/unexpected behavior in Mailgun's systems.
2 votes -
2 votes
-
Request for method to programatically pull security event logs
Requesting to have an api endpoint or programmatic way of pulling security event logs (e.g. a org user logs in, if there was a failed login, activity of users etc) so they can be ported over into a SIEM.
2 votes -
2 votes
-
Support UTM Parameters and Google Analytics Integration
Support UTM Parameters and Google Analytics Integration.
Other competitors offer this or integration with solutions.
2 votes -
Routes Search
The filter for searching routes dynamically updates with EVERY KEYPRESS. Instead of updating the list of routes it's also updating the filter itself so you after every key you lose focus on the text input and have to reclick then retype one character
2 votes -
2 votes
-
Show Shared And Dedicated IPs Together
We would like to see the list of Shared IPs under the [Left Panel -> Sending -> IPs] page. Currently this page only shows the dedicated IP and when it is on Warmup Period, the domain will use shared IPs also and those may be a part of any DNSBL. So we cannot proactively monitor the shared IP blocklisting status on a regular basis. The ability to see those IPs and monitor them against DNSBLs should be better in all cases.
2 votes -
2 votes
-
Accept Messages with Incorrect Headers
Instead of rejecting messages with incorrect headers, your service should invalidate the header.
2 votes -
Capture Sandbox mails, Don't send real emails (like Mailtrap)
For testing purposes, we may want to send to multiple test emails. We can have a setting to capture these emails instead of actually sending them.
There would be no need to verify these email addresses since the emails are not actually sent.
Maybe this can be a separate functionality? With a limit of course.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?