Skip to content

Michael Judkins

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello,


    As we work through ideation on an alerts feature for Mailgun, I wanted to gauge opinion on the configuration of notification channels. If out of the box, Mailgun allows for configuration of notification channels to include emails addresses, webhooks, and Slack integration where in the flow does it make most sense where the channels are defined.


    Our position is that the pattern for notification channels is created on the account level. Such that any all alerts created would use the notification channels previously defined. This would be foundational to a future state is which users could have greater control on how Mailgun communicates emergent issues (e.g. some users would like to receive domain disablement or similar notification posted to webhook rather than email).


    So, for "alert and notify based on sending metrics and usage" is there any reason Mailgun needs to have notification channels defined on a per alert…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Michael Judkins commented  · 

    It would be great if there was an alert system that allowed us to send an email to someone on our team if the number of email sends for a particular domain were lower or higher than a certain range. You could also extend this to bounce rates, suppressed, etc. We have had a few issues with sending that went undetected and it would have been great to be alerted this way.

    Michael Judkins supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base