DMARC isn't really something for Mailgun to support... DMARC is just your domain telling recipients what to do with emails that fail to pass SPF and DKIM checks. As Mailgun do support SPF and DKIM then any DMARC policy you want to publish will work alongside their service.
I see no benefit to Mailgun creating a 'DMARC record generator' when others already exist for this. These policies can vary widely so it's not just a quick 'heres your DMARC record' blob for you to blindly cut and paste.
As for Mailgun handling DMARC reports, there may be a benefit to this but it is very likely that they'd get reports for email sent from other sources along with themselves. It's far better to have a dedicated service such as dmarcian or postmark look into this.
Although this is very highly voted I see little reason for Mailgun to enter this market. they should focus on improvements to their core business - sending email.
S C
DMARC isn't really something for Mailgun to support... DMARC is just your domain telling recipients what to do with emails that fail to pass SPF and DKIM checks. As Mailgun do support SPF and DKIM then any DMARC policy you want to publish will work alongside their service.
I see no benefit to Mailgun creating a 'DMARC record generator' when others already exist for this. These policies can vary widely so it's not just a quick 'heres your DMARC record' blob for you to blindly cut and paste.
As for Mailgun handling DMARC reports, there may be a benefit to this but it is very likely that they'd get reports for email sent from other sources along with themselves. It's far better to have a dedicated service such as dmarcian or postmark look into this.
Although this is very highly voted I see little reason for Mailgun to enter this market. they should focus on improvements to their core business - sending email.