Skip to content

Ivan Boitsov

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Ivan Boitsov supported this idea  · 
  2. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Hello,


    As we work through ideation on an alerts feature for Mailgun, I wanted to gauge opinion on the configuration of notification channels. If out of the box, Mailgun allows for configuration of notification channels to include emails addresses, webhooks, and Slack integration where in the flow does it make most sense where the channels are defined.


    Our position is that the pattern for notification channels is created on the account level. Such that any all alerts created would use the notification channels previously defined. This would be foundational to a future state is which users could have greater control on how Mailgun communicates emergent issues (e.g. some users would like to receive domain disablement or similar notification posted to webhook rather than email).


    So, for "alert and notify based on sending metrics and usage" is there any reason Mailgun needs to have notification channels defined on a per alert…

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ivan Boitsov commented  · 

    Hello!
    Maybe you can add email notification if there are a lot of fail email sendings? We just missed that our email domain was blocked by Mail.Ru servers.

    Ivan Boitsov supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base